canadian-carbine:

John Douangdara - DEVGRU Dog Handler - KIA August 6, 2011

Rest Easy SEAL

bogleech:

florafaunagifs:

Leaf bug (Phyllium giganteum)

The constant wobbling as they move is a part of their disguise, making it seem as though the “leaf” is only moving because of a light breeze.

If you blow on one it will also shake around in the hopes of matching any actual surrounding leaves

mr-cappadocia:

airwinstudios:

theforgottenangel1s:

mr-cappadocia:

The State Legislature has passed, in its glorious wisdom a bill that mandates that colleges must observe a “Yes means Yes” standard on college campuses.

Or you can be convicted of rape.

image

Keep in mind, the wording concerning body language was intentionally left out. This means if a girl doesn’t explicitly say “Yes” you’re a fucking rapist as far as the State of California is concerned.

image

If a girl sucks your dick without first saying she wants to… you’ve raped her. Because let’s be honest, this standard will only be applied in one direction.

Keep in mind, you’re not just required to ask your partner if she’s consenting as you engage in sex.. you have to fucking REPEATEDLY ASK DURING THE SEX ACT because if you don’t she can say “I tensed up and he didn’t stop therefore he raped me”.

I’m not fucking making that up. That the actual example they use.

image

So… in closing. If you’re a male and you attend a college in California FUCKING RUN because your college has a vested financial interest in fucking destroying you.

image

Fuck this shit

Or… You know… Crazy fucking thought… If you have any shred of a doubt that a girl is having second thoughts… You say… “Hey! Are you ok?” And she either says “Yes!” Or she doesn’t. Like it’s that hard for the GUY to talk while he is getting a blow job.

And what if you don’t? What if you don’t pick up on that subtle cue? Does that make you a rapist?

Here’s a scenario… You bring a girl home, she undresses you while you undress her. She pulls a condom out of her purse and puts it on your dick. You fall over onto the bed, she climbs on top of you and starts bouncing with all the Lord gave her.

And mid bounce she remembers “Oh shit, I have a boyfriend, I shouldn’t be doing this” and momentarily tenses up… but keeps fucking.

Well, you’re now a rapist.

That’s what you’re defending. And when I use the word literally it’s not hyperbole.

So here it is… that’s *literally* the scenario you’re defending.

Read this carefully:

Recognizing the dynamic nature of sexual activity, individuals choosing to engage in sexual activity must evaluate consent in an ongoing manner and communicate clearly throughout all stages of sexual activity.  Withdrawal of consent can be an expressed “no” or can be based on an outward demonstration that conveys that an individual is hesitant, confused, uncertain or is no longer a mutual participant. Once consent is withdrawn, the sexual activity must cease immediately and all parties must obtain mutually expressed or clearly stated consent before continuing further sexual activity.

The first and the last bits are arguably the most important.

For example… if I fuck a girl and then cuddle up to her afterwards without her expressly stating she wanted it before I did… I sexually assaulted her by this definition.

If I fuck a girl and during the act she gives any indication, however imperceptible that she doesn’t want to, or even if she doesn’t (remember the no longer a mutual participant which is so vaguely worded as to be a legal abomination)… I’m a rapist.

And that last bit is where you get super insane. If a girl is sucking my dick and stops with my cock still in her mouth… I JUST BECAME A FUCKING RAPIST. She just chose for me to be a rapist by leaving my dick in her mouth after deciding she didn’t want to have sex.

And keep in mind… these aren’t scenarios where I have to prove my innocence… these are scenarios that according to the letter of the law I am absolutely fucking guilty.

How can you, in any conscience, defend this?

faephobia:

draumbouy:

ONE STUDY? WELL FUCK. THAT PROVES EVERYTHING.

THE SYSTEM MUST BE SOOOOO CORRUPT BECAUSE COMEDY CENTRAL DID A BIT ABOUT ONE STUDY!!!!!

seriously though get your head out of your ass dude.

women are out-earning men in their fields. there are studies that show this does that mean that now men are being discriminated against?

you guys wanna know the real reason for the wage gap?

heres over 30 sources that explain it that dont come from comedy central but from people who actually know what the fuck they’re talking about like Forbes, and Time, and professional economists. not news anchors on television networks pandering to fans for punchlines and higher ratings.

salaries are negotiable. meaning that if you want a higher salary you have to fight for it. the independent women’s forum did a video explaining this.

soooo you can either listen to comedy central and ONE study from yale. ooooor you could be logical and listen to the 30+ professional journalist organizations and women’s activism committees that actually know what they’re talking about.

I mean, I sympathise with women feeling forced to miss out on their career because it’s often socially expected for mothers to stay home with their kids, but the solution to that is making it more socially acceptable for fathers to do it instead so their wives/partners can return to work so it’ll no longer be a ‘female’ role. Anything else isn’t really fair and is only ingraining and over-complicating the problem.

As for male candidates being more likely to be picked over female candidates, it doesn’t sound implausible, but again, that’s probably because companies want to avoid young women who are likely to have children and then go on maternity leave etc. It’s due to FINANCIAL CONCERNS, not misogynistic bias, and what do you know? Businesses are all about money! I mean, this really isn’t rocket science.
The solution here is the same as the previous: untangle women from the role as stay-at-home caregiver and there won’t be that problem.

As for blaming women, no. We’re not. We’re blaming the system in place, as opposed to, say, businesses for trying to function as businesses and make money as opposed to lose it (how dare they).

megachrispct:

disneysnewgroove:

Disney movies in order of historical setting

(Excludes most of the package films. Some films, eg The Lion King, are impossible to pin down exactly and some, like Aladdin and Treasure Planet, are anachronistic, so these are estimations. A few have been split into 2 if there is more than one time period in the movie, and sequels have been put together.)

No Wall-E?? D:

eretzyisrael:

“the new anti-Semitism… It targets the Jewish people by targeting Israel.” Canada’s prime minister  #Harper about the Delegitimization of #israel

eretzyisrael:

“the new anti-Semitism… It targets the Jewish people by targeting Israel.” 

Canada’s prime minister  #Harper about the Delegitimization of #israel

justanotherconservative:

The World Trade Center04/04/1973 — 09/11/2001

justanotherconservative:

The World Trade Center
04/04/1973 — 09/11/2001

Wouldn't you love to see the fireworks that would result from a tumblr feminist telling a scotsman he has the same white culture as an englishman? Wait no, she'd get her teeth knocked in. Bad idea.

dontneedfeminism:

I’m Scandinavian. Someone coming up to me and telling me that my culture is ‘white culture’ and lumping me in with every other white culture out there is grossly offensive. 

Not all black people have the same culture. 

Not all Latin’s are from mexico 

Not all Asian’s are from china. 

Gross generalizations are a serious problem, they aren’t acceptable for non white cultures and they aren’t acceptable for white cultures. “It’s okay because their white” is not an acceptable answer. It’s just acceptable racism according to SJW’s. 

-The Silly One. 

therealashleydionne:

If it were I’d be soooo rich.

therealashleydionne:

If it were I’d be soooo rich.